Menu
Peter Jacobs
Peter Jacobs is Business Insiders military and defense editor. he graduated from Cornell University in 2013 with a degree in popular-music criticisms and minors in English and History. At Cornell he served as an arts and entertainment editor and news editor for the student newspaper. he also was editor-in-chief of IvyGate, an Ivy League news and gossip blog.
I read and covered his "Top 20 Most Powerful Millennials." It is different that he writes as a military and defense editor, but wrote about powerful millennials.
The speaker in the article is Peter Jacobs, but he doesn't really put much of his voice in the article because a majority of the article are pictures with titles. Only in the beginning is there a small paragraph explaining who millennials are.
The occasion is successful young people. I think?
The audience are millennials because people often like to see what positive things their generation is doing. Millenials get a lot of shade for being the generation that didn't have to work as hard as the Gen X.
The purpose is to inform people about powerful, and young influences. Not everybody on the list is a motivational speaker, but the people on the list have a say it what happens a lot of the time. Many are political leaders, who are powerful but not always the most positive. The article also shows that we might not view this millennial as a positive influence, but they certainly have a power on a global scale.
The topic is powerful millennials. Either through money, or fame, they are all very powerful.
The tone is kind of bland. The pictures are more interesting than the paragraph itself. Jacobs doesn't ever directly say his bias, but he selected these people for a reason. He puts a sentence about who they are and what they stand for, but don't really back it up with any evidence. Since the word choices are very casual, and he doesn't really have much to say about the people, I think the overall tone of it is blank and bleak.
I read and covered his "Top 20 Most Powerful Millennials." It is different that he writes as a military and defense editor, but wrote about powerful millennials.
The speaker in the article is Peter Jacobs, but he doesn't really put much of his voice in the article because a majority of the article are pictures with titles. Only in the beginning is there a small paragraph explaining who millennials are.
The occasion is successful young people. I think?
The audience are millennials because people often like to see what positive things their generation is doing. Millenials get a lot of shade for being the generation that didn't have to work as hard as the Gen X.
The purpose is to inform people about powerful, and young influences. Not everybody on the list is a motivational speaker, but the people on the list have a say it what happens a lot of the time. Many are political leaders, who are powerful but not always the most positive. The article also shows that we might not view this millennial as a positive influence, but they certainly have a power on a global scale.
The topic is powerful millennials. Either through money, or fame, they are all very powerful.
The tone is kind of bland. The pictures are more interesting than the paragraph itself. Jacobs doesn't ever directly say his bias, but he selected these people for a reason. He puts a sentence about who they are and what they stand for, but don't really back it up with any evidence. Since the word choices are very casual, and he doesn't really have much to say about the people, I think the overall tone of it is blank and bleak.